Star ratings vs ranking.
A star rating says how a film felt. A ranking says how it compares. Stars bunch up, so four stars can sit beside a film you love and one you barely remember. Head-to-head ranking asks an easier question, this one or that one, and the order it builds gives every number a reason.
What four stars hides
Look back through anyone’s star ratings and the same thing happens. Most films land between three and four stars. Two films with four stars might be miles apart, and the number can’t say which one you think is better.
Stars also drift. A four you gave five years ago and a four you gave last night were measured against different films and a different mood. Nothing connects them.
Why choosing between two is easier
People are better at comparing two things than at scoring one thing on its own. The psychologist L. L. Thurstone described this in 1927 as the law of comparative judgment, and it is why eye tests ask “better or worse?” instead of “how clear, out of ten?”
Ask whether a film is a 3.5 or a 4 and you hesitate. Ask whether it is better than the last film you loved and you usually know straight away.
Side by side
| Question | Star ratings | Head-to-head ranking |
|---|---|---|
| What you’re asked | How good was it, out of 5? | Which of these two is better? |
| What a number means | How the film felt on the night | Where the film sits among everything you’ve ranked |
| Two films with the same number | Common, and nothing separates them | Their order on your list still says which is higher |
| When your taste changes | Old ratings stay as they were | Re-rank and the order moves with you |
| Best for | A quick diary of what you watched | Knowing your favourites, in order |
How Ranked turns choices into a score
- Pick a lane. All-timer, Really good, Fine, Not for me or Disliked it. The lane is a rough sort, not a rating.
- Settle the close ones. Answer a few head-to-heads against films already in that lane until the new one lands in place.
- Read the score. The film’s place within its lane becomes a score out of 5. Every all-timer scores above every film you called really good.
You never type a number. Your list earns its scores. How Ranked scores work has the detail.
Questions
- Is ranking more accurate than star ratings?
- It is more consistent. A star rating depends on your mood and on what you rated last. A head-to-head asks which of two films you think is better, which most people answer quickly and the same way twice. Enough of those answers give an order that holds up.
- Doesn’t ranking every film take forever?
- Not if you sort first. In Ranked you give a film a lane, such as All-timer or Fine, and it is only compared with films in that lane. A few head-to-heads place it, and you can say two films are too close to call.
- Can I still see a number for each film?
- Yes. In Ranked, a film’s place within its lane becomes a score out of 5. You never type the number. Scores switch on once 10 films are on your list.
- What happens when my taste changes?
- Re-rank the film. Its place moves, and its score moves with it. A list that changes with you is the point, not a flaw.
- Are star ratings ever the better choice?
- Yes. Stars are quick for logging a film the night you watch it, and a diary of stars is a fine record of how each viewing felt. Ranking is for knowing how films compare with each other.
Ranked, not rated. Choose between two films you’ve seen.
Download on the App StoreRanked is for iPhone, for people 18 and over.
Letterboxd, named in a link on this page, is a trademark of Letterboxd Limited. Ranked is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to Letterboxd.